Tuesday, August 22, 2006

illegal to feed homeless???

what do you think of this article?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14168471/

I read in several other articles that the penalty for feeding homeless in Las Vegas Parks is up to 6 months in jail and a $1000 fine.

My first question is what is the motive in passing this law? Honestly, the cynic in me wants to say these politicians just want to clean up their parks and make them look better...but there is a possibility that they are trying to help the homeless.

The mayor stated that, "What we're trying to do is get the homeless to be fed in a social service environment, within a faith based environment, where there's a social worker, a doctor that puts them on meds, you get them back into society, instead of feeding them and running and leaving them there,"

That sounds great in theory. But the fact is...the United States is filled with chronic homeless people and it is not because churches and Salvation Army's go down there on Saturday mornings and give them break fast. The more I work with the homeless population, the more I realize that there is always going to be a percentage that will never come and use our non-profit, faith based, or government services. I work with youth from 9-21 that are living on the streets. We have many in that age group that are not allowed to use our services for various reasons. I have met homeless youth that have burned their bridges at all the social service programs and youth that have no desire to come in and set up goals and work with case managers. We absolutely need to equip the homeless to help themselves. We need to teach them and help them get off the streets, but what do we do with the percentage that are too mentally ill or too fried on drugs to come into those centers? It is wrong to just feed them and leave them there to be homeless, but it is childish and naive to think that every single homeless person is ready to break away from that life and come, get on meds, and get back into society. We cannot help people that do not want to help themselves, but we can still offer them the basic necessities. What is our duty as a Christian to meet immediate needs as well as long-term? Are we called to only feed those that are hungry if they want to be integrated back into society?

When I read the Mayor's defense I suddenly had images flash through my head of Christians and churches defending this law because it sounds so good. I pray I am wrong. Are we called to only show compassion and kindness to the non-drug attics, the non-lazy, the ones that are desperately trying to get off the streets? No, we are called to meet the needs of those around us...regardless of what their mental state is. I think the church needs to be strategic in how they do that. There probably are too many churches doing feeds on Saturday mornings and then just leaving it at that...there needs to be a balance between meeting immediate needs and deliberately planning long-term ways to help those who are poor get out of their situation.

To think that I could be sitting in a park, hand out some granola bars and juice to a homeless man, and end up having to spend 6 months in jail or pay a $1000 fine is ridiculous. To think that a local church cannot go to their neighborhood park and hand out water bottles on a hot summer day is sickening. I pray the Christian community of Las Vegas passionately gets involved in this. The government of Las Vegas may be trying to help the homeless find more long-term help, but in reality what they are doing is trying to strip away the human right to show compassion and kindness.